| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Solstice Project
Highsec Outlaw Elementary School
2609
   |
Posted - 2013.01.21 18:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
Google Voices wrote:Because the vaunted PvPer's are mostly gankers that couldn't fight a fair fight if it slapped them in the face.
EVE attracts the worst dregs of humanity with it's open sandbox concept.
It also attracts some really good smart people, but most of them get tired of the behavior of the kiddy pirate fanbase and leave....
I'm in Osmon.
Come get some.
Or shut the hell up.
(edit: when i logged in, of course)
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Solstice Project
Highsec Outlaw Elementary School
2609
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 18:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Anyway, because everybody seems to drop his opinion.
I have no issue with the duelling mechanic, because nothing keeps me out of it.
I don't care about arenas, as long as arenas are publicly known, can be stormed and shiploss is mandatory for winning.
Have a nice day.
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Solstice Project
Highsec Outlaw Elementary School
2609
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 18:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aza Ebanu wrote:Tippia wrote:Bane Necran wrote:I doubt people are going to start having duels instead of wars. Or duels instead of gatecamps.  I'm not talking about behaviour GÇö I'm talking about mechanics. All mechanics for consensual combat are encapsulated within the mechanics of non-consensual combat, and no consensual combat can ever be allowed to exist outside the real of non-consensual engagements. Thus, consensual mechanics are either unnecessary or game-breaking. Either way, there's no point in or need to add them. You must be blind or something. A duel is consensual PVP without a sec hit where you and another player can duel without the interruption of another player. Bad attitudes are game breaking and there is no point or need for that either.
Why are you willingly ignoring the whole point of the argument,
namely that nowhere in EvE, at no time ever, people were/are/should be shielded from the others ?
(edit: in space, of course)
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Solstice Project
Highsec Outlaw Elementary School
2610
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 19:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Aza Ebanu wrote:There are all kinds of shields from others, it depends on which side of the shield you are on to see it though. The Op was asking about adding a feature that allows him to engage in a duel. Duels can exist in EVE, and with the attitudes of the player base, they should.
Yes, duels can exist. I have no issue with that.
But shielding duellants from the others can't.
The whole concept of EvE builds on the fact that everybody can always interact with everybody else, in space,
if he wishes and manages to do so. There is not a single game mechanic that prevents anybody from doing so.
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Solstice Project
Highsec Outlaw Elementary School
2616
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 09:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
dark heartt wrote:Posting in a thread about fred who's soon to be dead laying in a bed next to the girl he wed. WHAT ??
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Solstice Project
Highsec Outlaw Elementary School
2616
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 09:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Warp Planet6 wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:How do you use current mechanics to allow 2 parties to engage in a limited conflict similar to what the duel system will allow? Move lowsec, warp planet 6 and fight like a boss. That doesn't provide any of the benefits of the duel system. Or the safety; it merely removes the risk that is the hallmark of Eve Online. Curious that, no? I don't want to play WoW in Space. I don't want to play Aeon in Space. You guys want that pussification in the way you play, leave. I'll happily hold the door for you (and no, I don't want your tainted stuffs). You could help them finding the door, you know.
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Solstice Project
Highsec Outlaw Elementary School
2626
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 13:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
I'm a con.
I'm sensual.
This confuses me.
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
| |
|